Recently, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed a new rule to limit the inclusion of medical debt in consumer credit reports. This move has sparked serious concerns among financial experts and members of Congress, particularly the House Financial Services Committee, which expressed their opposition in a formal letter. They argue that the rule could disrupt the credit system, making it harder for consumers, especially low-income borrowers, to access affordable credit. Here’s an overview of the concerns raised in their letter.
Background on Medical Debt and Credit Reporting
For the past 50 years, creditors have relied on medical debt information when evaluating a consumer’s creditworthiness. This was established under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) in 1970, with further regulations in 2003 to safeguard the privacy of medical data. However, the inclusion of medical debt in credit reports continues to provide a fuller picture of a borrower’s financial health, helping lenders make informed decisions on loan repayment abilities.
The CFPB’s New Proposal
In June 2024, the CFPB introduced a proposal to prevent credit reporting companies from sharing medical debt with lenders and to bar lenders from using medical information in credit decisions. The CFPB claims this is necessary because medical debt often appears inaccurately on credit reports and has little predictive value for other types of loans.
However, members of the House Financial Services Committee, in a letter addressed to CFPB Director Rohit Chopra, questioned the motivation and legality of this rule. They pointed out several key concerns that challenge the validity of the CFPB’s proposal.
Key Concerns Raised in the Committee’s Letter
- Lack of Current Data: The committee criticized the CFPB for not using recent data to support the rule. They noted that the CFPB is relying on a 2014 study that combines medical and non-medical collections, without distinguishing between paid and unpaid medical debts. This weakens the argument that all medical debt should be excluded from credit reports.
- Accuracy of Medical Debt Reporting: The CFPB claims medical debt is often inaccurately reported, but the committee argued that the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) already mandates accurate and complete credit reports. Additionally, existing dispute processes allow for the correction of inaccuracies. The letter pointed out that the CFPB has not demonstrated why these measures are insufficient, nor has it provided evidence that inaccuracies in medical debt reporting are more prevalent than in other types of debt.
- Impact on Consumers: The letter warns of potential negative consequences for consumers, particularly vulnerable populations. If medical debt is removed from credit reports, medical providers may require more upfront payments, making healthcare less accessible to those who cannot afford to pay in full. Additionally, some high-risk borrowers could be denied credit or face higher costs due to incomplete credit information.
- Economic Ramifications: The committee raised concerns about the economic impact of the rule. By withholding important medical debt information, lenders might unknowingly extend credit to individuals who are at higher risk of default, which could destabilize the financial system. At the same time, some borrowers might struggle to access credit, or find it too expensive, due to incomplete financial transparency.
Conclusion
The House Financial Services Committee’s letter highlights serious concerns with the CFPB’s proposed rule on medical debt. While the CFPB’s goal is to protect consumers, the committee argues that the rule could have unintended negative consequences, including higher healthcare costs and reduced access to credit, especially for low-income individuals.
As the debate continues, the committee hopes their letter will persuade the CFPB to reconsider its approach and opt for a more data-driven, balanced solution that protects consumers while ensuring stability in the financial system.
Author: Jennifer Evancic
Jennifer.Evancic@ResourceManagement.com
Jennifer Evancic is a third-party auditor valued by creditors and large organizations for her knowledge in call monitoring within the collections industry. With meticulous attention to detail and a firm grasp of regulatory requirements, she ensures compliance with clients’ criteria and state and federal regulations.
Jennifer audits collections calls, ensuring they meet client-specific criteria and comply with regulations, providing valuable insights and maintaining industry standards.
Beyond her auditing responsibilities, Jennifer takes the lead in organizing and facilitating monthly call calibrations. These sessions serve as a collaborative forum where clients and their vendors come together to discuss call monitoring results and address any findings or areas for improvement. Jennifer’s guidance fosters open communication and ensures alignment between clients and vendors, driving continuous improvement in collections practices.
Jennifer stays up-to-date with compliance and industry best practices by participating regularly in peer meetings, regulatory updates and industry webinars. This keeps her informed about emerging issues and ensures she remains a knowledgeable leader in collections compliance.
Sign Up for the Twice Monthly Newsletter
Just enter your email address at the top orange bar at:
Collection Compliance Experts – “The Power of Expertise: Oversight Perfected”
It’s that easy! Twice a month – we provide blog updates and Resources for the Collection and Industry Professional.
Your email is just for this newsletter. We never sell your information. No fee. Opt-out at any time.
